Our nation's debt is literally indenturing our children to our international debt holders, but most Americans don't care because they are more concerned about the latest saga involving Snooki on Jersey Shore rather than what really matters, our country’s future.
Showing posts with label SEC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEC. Show all posts

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes? | Rolling Stone Politics

Personally I can't stand Rolling Stones liberal biases but that said there is no other investigative business reporter on the planet that has broken more stories on Wall Street corruption than Matt Taibbi.

Imagine a world in which a man who is repeatedly investigated for a string of serious crimes, but never prosecuted, has his slate wiped clean every time the cops fail to make a case. No more Lifetime channel specials where the murderer is unveiled after police stumble upon past intrigues in some old file – "Hey, chief, didja know this guy had two wives die falling down the stairs?" No more burglary sprees cracked when some sharp cop sees the same name pop up in one too many witness statements. This is a different world, one far friendlier to lawbreakers, where even the suspicion of wrongdoing gets wiped from the record.

That, it now appears, is exactly how the Securities and Exchange Commission has been treating the Wall Street criminals who cratered the global economy a few years back. For the past two decades, according to a whistle-blower at the SEC who recently came forward to Congress, the agency has been systematically destroying records of its preliminary investigations once they are closed. By whitewashing the files of some of the nation's worst financial criminals, the SEC has kept an entire generation of federal investigators in the dark about past inquiries into insider trading, fraud and market manipulation against companies like Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and AIG. With a few strokes of the keyboard, the evidence gathered during thousands of investigations – "18,000 ... including Madoff," as one high-ranking SEC official put it during a panicked meeting about the destruction – has apparently disappeared forever into the wormhole of history.

Under a deal the SEC worked out with the National Archives and Records Administration, all of the agency's records – "including case files relating to preliminary investigations" – are supposed to be maintained for at least 25 years. But the SEC, using history-altering practices that for once actually deserve the overused and usually hysterical term "Orwellian," devised an elaborate and possibly illegal system under which staffers were directed to dispose of the documents from any preliminary inquiry that did not receive approval from senior staff to become a full-blown, formal investigation. Amazingly, the wholesale destruction of the cases – known as MUIs, or "Matters Under Inquiry" – was not something done on the sly, in secret. The enforcement division of the SEC even spelled out the procedure in writing, on the commission's internal website. "After you have closed a MUI that has not become an investigation," the site advised staffers, "you should dispose of any documents obtained in connection with the MUI."

Many of the destroyed files involved companies and individuals who would later play prominent roles in the economic meltdown of 2008. Two MUIs involving con artist Bernie Madoff vanished. So did a 2002 inquiry into financial fraud at Lehman Brothers, as well as a 2005 case of insider trading at the same soon-to-be-bankrupt bank. A 2009 preliminary investigation of insider trading by Goldman Sachs was deleted, along with records for at least three cases involving the infamous hedge fund SAC Capital.

The widespread destruction of records was brought to the attention of Congress in July, when an SEC attorney named Darcy Flynn decided to blow the whistle. According to Flynn, who was responsible for helping to manage the commission's records, the SEC has been destroying records of preliminary investigations since at least 1993. After he alerted NARA to the problem, Flynn reports, senior staff at the SEC scrambled to hide the commission's improprieties.

Read more here: Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes? | Rolling Stone Politics

SEC may have destroyed documents, senator says - MarketWatch

Oops doesn't cut it when a target is being investigated by the SEC and it shouldn't be sufficient to get the SEC off the hook even if the destruction was accidental.

This sounds like either the SEC was covering for its Wall Street cronies or its own ineptitude in catching crooks like Madoff. Either way they have some serious explaining to do to Congress. 


WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The Securities and Exchange Commission may have destroyed documents and compromised enforcement cases involving activity at large banks and hedge funds during the height of the financial crisis in 2008, according to allegations made by a lawmaker on Wednesday.
“From what I’ve seen, it looks as if the SEC might have sanctioned some level of case-related document destruction,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley, Republican of Iowa, in a letter to the agency’s chairman, Mary Schapiro. 

“It doesn’t make sense that an agency responsible for investigations would want to get rid of potential evidence. If these charges are true, the agency needs to explain why it destroyed documents, how many documents it destroyed over what timeframe, and to what extent its actions were consistent with the law.”
Agency staff “destroyed over 9,000 files” related to preliminary agency investigations, according to a letter sent in July to Grassley, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and obtained by MarketWatch. 

The allegations were made by SEC enforcement attorney, Darcy Flynn, in a letter to Grassley. Flynn is a current employee, and according to the letter, received a bonus for his past year’s work. 

Flynn alleges the SEC destroyed files related to matters being examined in important cases such as Bernard Madoff and a $50 billion Ponzi scheme he operated as well as an investigation involving Goldman Sachs Group Inc. trading in American International Group credit-default swaps in 2009. 

Flynn also alleged that the agency destroyed documents and information collected for preliminary investigations at Wells Fargo & Co. , Bank of America Corp., Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley and the now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers. 

The letter goes into particular detail about Deutsche Bank, the former employer of current SEC enforcement chief Robert Khuzami as well as former enforcement chiefs Gary Lynch and Richard Walker.


Read more here: SEC may have destroyed documents, senator says - MarketWatch

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

SEC-Citi Settlement Under Scrutiny - Zacks.com

The whole purpose of Sarbanes-Oxley was to make sure that investors could make well informed decisions and rely on the veracity of financial filings by public companies. 

We were told that CEOs, CFOs, Lawyers, and Accountants were going to be held criminally liable if they helped to lie to the public about the financial health of a publicly traded corporation.

But instead of being held criminally liable Citi is getting treated by the SEC as if a failure to disclose $40 Billion is a matter of just forgetting to carry the 1 and not as the criminal act that it was.

It is reprehensible that the former CFO was allowed to pay a $100,000, fine without admitting what he did was wrong both morally and criminally. He should be spending his twilight years in a federal prison not in his $2 Million plus mansion in New Canaan, CT.

Remember America no matter what they tell you Main Street will always get the shaft in favor of Wall Street getting a pass.

SEC-Citi Settlement Under Scrutiny - Zacks.com

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has defended its $75 million settlement with Citigroup Inc. to square off charges for the misleading disclosures of subprime exposures made by Citi in 2007. The SEC has asked for court approval over this arrangement.

In July, Citi had agreed to pay $75 million in an effort to settle charges brought by the SEC over subprime exposures disclosure by the company. Besides allegations against the company, the charges also individually targeted two of the Citi executives for preparing and approving deceptive statements. Both have agreed to settle the charges.

This scrutiny comes as the U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle was not satisfied with the settlement, asking for further information before the accord’s approval. Judge Huvelle questioned why the current shareholders of Citi should suffer for the alleged misdoings of Citi’s executives, notably Gary Crittenden and Arthur Tildesley, Jr.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Open Government is a thing of the past

President Obama promised that his administration would open and transparent. He even went so so far as to memorialize this in a memo to the heads of the Executive Departments and Agencies:
           Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies

SUBJECT: Transparency and Open Government

My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

Government should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing. Information maintained by the Federal Government is a national asset. My Administration will take appropriate action, consistent with law and policy, to disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use. Executive departments and agencies should harness new technologies to put information about their operations and decisions online and readily available to the public. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public feedback to identify information of greatest use to the public.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/

Well that policy was short lived. As a result of the new Financial Regulatory Reform Act the SEC has been exempted from all Freedom of Information Act requests. There will no longer be any more embarrassing stories from the press about the ineptitude of the SEC in its handling of Madoff, Stanford or Pequot when the SEC fails in its job in the future.

So much for transparency.


Under a little-noticed provision of the recently passed financial-reform legislation, the Securities and Exchange Commission no longer has to comply with virtually all requests for information releases from the public, including those filed under the Freedom of Information Act.

The law, signed last week by President Obama, exempts the SEC from disclosing records or information derived from "surveillance, risk assessments, or other regulatory and oversight activities." Given that the SEC is a regulatory body, the provision covers almost every action by the agency, lawyers say. Congress and federal agencies can request information, but the public cannot.

That argument comes despite the President saying that one of the cornerstones of the sweeping new legislation was more transparent financial markets. Indeed, in touting the new law, Obama specifically said it would “increase transparency in financial dealings."

The SEC cited the new law Tuesday in a FOIA action brought by FOX Business Network. Steven Mintz, founding partner of law firm Mintz & Gold LLC in New York, lamented what he described as “the backroom deal that was cut between Congress and the SEC to keep the SEC’s failures secret. The only losers here are the American public.”

If the SEC’s interpretation stands, Mintz, who represents FOX Business Network, predicted “the next time there is a Bernie Madoff failure the American public will not be able to obtain the SEC documents that describe the failure,” referring to the shamed broker whose Ponzi scheme cost investors billions.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2010/07/28/sec-says-new-finreg-law-exempts-public-disclosure/