Showing posts with label nationalized healthcare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nationalized healthcare. Show all posts
Monday, January 31, 2011
Florida Judge Rules Against Health Law - WSJ.com
A Florida federal judge on Monday ruled that a key plank of the health overhaul passed last March violates the Constitution, dealing a second judicial blow to the Obama administration's signature legislative achievement.
The case is considered the most high-profile of a series of federal lawsuits against the health overhaul. Attorneys general and governors from 20 states initially filed the lawsuit, and six more got behind it earlier this month. All but four of them are Republicans.
In his ruling, Judge Roger Vinson, a Republican appointee, said that the law's requirement to carry insurance or pay a fee "is outside Congress' Commerce Clause power, and it cannot be otherwise authorized by an assertion of power under the Necessary and Proper Clause. It is not constitutional."
The ruling also said that entire law "must be declared void," because the mandate to carry insurance is "not severable" from the rest of the law.
That differed from an earlier ruling against the law by U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson in Virginia. Judge Hudson found that the individual mandate was unconstitutional, but he said his ruling applied only to the part of the law that established the mandate and any directly dependent provisions that refer to that part. Exactly what that applied to was unclear.
Judge Vinson, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, ruled against the plaintiffs and in favor of the Obama administration on one point, saying that the law's expansion of the Medicaid federal-state insurance program for the poor does not violate the Constitution.
He wrote that states "have little recourse to remaining the very junior partner in this partnership."
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Another consequence of Obamacare raises the cost of medicines
I have personally never used my FSA to buy OTC's medicines because the simple fact of the matter is that my family always uses the max allowable either for co-pays or the dentist. However, for people like my parents who take a baby asprin each day for heart conditions the fact that they now need to get a prescription is idiotic. This new policy raises a few questions related to the implementation of this law. How does the IRS intend to enforce this provison of the law? Will people be required to file their prescriptions with their tax returns? Will the pharmacy need to keep track of the precriptions for OTC drugs so that a person can use the FSA debt card? In the end this is just another example of how stupid the new healthcare law is and why it needs to be defunded (repeal would be nice but almost impossible to do).
New Rules Coming for Payments Out of Health Savings Accounts
Under the new health care law, consumers using workplace pre-tax health savings accounts will soon need a doctor's note to pay for Tylenol and an estimated 15,000 other over-the-counter drugs.
Starting Jan. 1, employees who use flexible spending accounts (FSAs), health saving accounts (HSAs), or health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) to pay for common medications such as pain relievers, cold medicines, antacids and allergy medications will need prescriptions. The new rules don't apply to insulin.
The new rules will also prohibit the use of FSA or HRA debit cards provided by administrative plans for over-the-counter purchases, because the IRS says there's no way to prove the drugs were prescribed.
The IRS says any money removed from HSA accounts to pay for medical expenses bought without a prescription will be included as taxable income and subject to an additional tax of 20 percent.
Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, the industry lobby that voiced support for the overhaul but has been accused by some of the law's proponents of trying to undermine it, said the law creates "unintended consequences."
"It creates unnecessary hassles for consumers and provides the wrong kind of incentives," Zirkelbach said, adding that the changes could make it more difficult for consumers to get medicines they need at costs they can afford.
"This change could have the unintended consequence of increasing health care costs," he said. It might provide an incentive for consumers to go back on more expensive medications when over-the-counter medicine works just fine."
More than 10 million consumers use HSAs, according to a survey done in January by AHIP. That's up from 8 million in 2009 and 6.1 million in 2008.
According to an analysis by benefits administrator Aon Hewitt of more than 220 employers covering more than 6 million workers, 20 percent of employees, or 1.2 million, contributed to an FSA in 2010. Of those workers, the average annual contribution is $1,441.
FSAs and HSAs allow workers to reduce their taxable income to pay for qualified health care or child care expenses. Anyone with a high-deductible medical insurance plan can obtain an HSA. The IRS defined a high-deductible plan in 2010 as $1,200 a year for individuals and $2,400 for families.
FSAs, which were first authorized by Congress in 1978, are only available through employers who offer the plans. But FSAs face another new rule under the Affordable Care Act -- a limit on the pre-tax contributions to $2,500, starting Jan. 1, 2013. There is currently no limit on how much an employee can contribute to FSAs, although employers can impose one.
Lawmakers imposed the cap to help pay for provisions that will expand coverage starting in 2014. The cap is expected to raise $13 billion for other government-provided health care services offered between 2013 and 2019.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Friday, July 24, 2009
House Democrats Are Now Banning Republicans From Excercising Their Right To Free Speech
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Healthcare Is a Good, Not a Right- by Ron Paul
We all know nationalized healthcare doesn't work. If it worked why then are the wealthy in Canada and Europe coming to the U.S. for their heathcare. Ron Paul is a doctor and I believe his bill would bring healthcare costs down.
Healthcare Is a Good, Not a Right
Healthcare Is a Good, Not a Right
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
